Brayton Purcell LLP

Call For A Free Consultation
800-598-0314

Call For A Free Consultation 800-598-0314

Brayton Purcell LLP
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Our Beliefs
      • Giving Back
      • Our Associations And Memberships
      • The Right To Trial By Jury
    • Regions Served
    • Careers
    • Our Employees Pets
    • Press Releases
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Mesothelioma/Asbestos
    • Personal Injury/Wrongful Death
    • Toxic Substances
    • Estate Planning
    • Other Areas Of Practice
  • Court Successes
    • Trial Verdicts
    • Appeals
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
    • Our Beliefs
      • Giving Back
      • Our Associations And Memberships
      • The Right To Trial By Jury
    • Regions Served
    • Careers
    • Our Employees Pets
    • Press Releases
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Mesothelioma/Asbestos
    • Personal Injury/Wrongful Death
    • Toxic Substances
    • Estate Planning
    • Other Areas Of Practice
  • Court Successes
    • Trial Verdicts
    • Appeals
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact

California Appeals Court Revives Airborne Asbestos Exposure Case

by Brayton Purcell LLP | Dec 4, 2018 | Mesothelioma

judge with a gavel

The Sixth District California Court of Appeal recently revived a unique asbestos case that had previously involved summary judgment for the defendant asbestos manufacturers.

The appellate court panel’s decision paves the way for the surviving family members of Dean Trapp, who died of mesothelioma in 2014, to move forward with their suit against asbestos and asbestos-containing products manufacturers CertainTeed Corp and Calaveras Asbestos, Limited.

Background of the case

This case doesn’t involve direct occupational exposure or even secondary exposure to asbestos fibers. Instead, Mr. Trapp, who both lived and worked within a few miles of CertainTeed Corp’s cement pipe factory for years (Calaveras Asbestos supplied the asbestos used in those pipes), suffered airborne exposure to asbestos particulates in the air originating from the factory. The case alleges strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty, and failure to warn claims against the defendants for contaminating the ambient air with unsafe levels of asbestos.

Mr. Trapp’s surviving family members brought suit back in 2014 following his death. Defendants sought and received summary judgment in 2016. The appeals court decision reverses the summary judgment, stating that defense experts had not shown that airborne particulates from the defendants’ businesses could not have caused Mr. Trapp’s mesothelioma.

Specifically, the appeals court decision found that take-home exposure and airborne exposure are both proven methods of exposure to asbestos, and “it is certainly not clear, as the trial court assumed, that one method of exposure is more serious and life-threatening than the other.”

Recent Posts

  • Boiler Room Workers and Asbestos Exposure
  • Mitigating the financial impact of mesothelioma treatments
  • The EPA’s difficulty with data disclosure
  • Judge orders EPA to close loopholes on asbestos-related reporting
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Increases Pension Rate for 2021

Archives

Categories

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Free Consultation

Take The First Step In Resolving Your Issue. Send Us An Email.

Email Us For A Response

San Francisco
Bay Area Office

222 Rush Landing Road Novato, CA 94945

Novato Office
222 Rush Landing Road
Novato, CA 94945
Toll Free: 800-598-0314
Phone: 415-898-1555
Fax: 415-898-1247

Map & Directions

Southern California
Office

12 28th Street Venice, California 90291

Los Angeles Office
12 28th Street
Venice, California 90291
Toll Free: 800-598-0314
Phone: 415-898-1555
Fax: 415-898-1247

Map & Directions
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2021 Brayton Purcell LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters

Review Us