In a major win for victims of asbestos‑contaminated cosmetics, a California appeals court has upheld a $51 million verdict against Avon Products Inc. The ruling rejects Avon’s attempts to overturn the jury’s decision, affirming the company’s responsibility for exposing consumers to asbestos‑contaminated talc products for decades.
The California 2nd District Court of Appeal found no merit in Avon’s challenges to expert testimony or trial court procedures. As a result, the full judgment for plaintiff Rita‑Ann Chapman remains intact—an important outcome for families pursuing justice in asbestos‑talc cases.
In 2022, a jury determined that Avon was 90% responsible for Chapman’s mesothelioma, a terminal cancer caused by asbestos exposure. The remaining 10% was attributed to Hyster‑Yale Group Inc., where Chapman’s husband worked with asbestos‑containing industrial products. The combined verdict totaled $52.1 million, consisting of $40.8 million in compensatory damages and $11.3 million in punitive damages.
One of the most damning factors was evidence showing Avon knew about the dangers of contaminated talc as early as the 1970s. Internal documents revealed that the company participated in industry‑wide testing, yet it continued to market talc powders—primarily to women and children—without any warning labels.
The jury awarded $10.3 million in punitive damages based on evidence that Avon intentionally continued selling four talc products known to contain high asbestos levels for 103 days to clear its inventory. Chapman tragically passed away in March 2025, just two years after winning her case.
How Avon’s Talc Products Exposed Consumers to Asbestos
Chapman’s exposure began when she was just eight years old. Like many consumers, she used Avon’s talc-based body and face powders as part of her daily routine. Because talc is mined from the earth near asbestos deposits, contamination is a known risk. When asbestos fibers are present in cosmetic talc, they can become airborne during use and easily inhaled.
Chapman breathed in these microscopic fibers for decades.
Her exposure was twofold:
- Primary Exposure
- Avon talc-based powders she applied regularly
- Airborne asbestos fibers released with each use
- Long-term use throughout her childhood and adult life
- Secondary (Take‑Home) Exposure
- Her husband worked with asbestos-containing brakes, clutches, and gaskets at Hyster‑Yale Group Inc.
- Asbestos fibers on his work clothing were brought home unknowingly
- Chapman inhaled those fibers during routine laundering
This layered exposure significantly increased her risk of developing mesothelioma.
What This Ruling Means for Asbestos‑Talc Lawsuits
The appeals court ruling is important for several reasons:
- It Reinforces Corporate Accountability
By rejecting Avon’s arguments, the court affirmed that corporations cannot escape liability when they knowingly sell unsafe products.
- It Strengthens Expert Testimony Standards
The decision supports the credibility of scientific experts in asbestos litigation—a crucial point for future plaintiffs.
- It Signals Broader Legal Implications for the Cosmetics Industry
With about 200 pending talc-related lawsuits, Avon filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in August 2024. They are not alone. Companies such as:
- Chanel
- Revlon
- L’Oréal
- Justice (Tween Brands)
also face litigation involving contaminated talc products.
Meanwhile, Johnson & Johnson faces tens of thousands of lawsuits linking its talc to mesothelioma, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer.
As more internal documents become public, courts and juries continue to scrutinize what these corporations knew—and what they chose to conceal.
If You or a Loved One Has Been Exposed to Asbestos‑Contaminated Talc, Brayton Purcell LLP Can Help
For over 40 years, Brayton Purcell LLP has been a national leader in asbestos and toxic exposure litigation. Our attorneys have secured some of the largest verdicts in the country on behalf of mesothelioma victims, including those harmed by contaminated cosmetics.
Call Brayton Purcell LLP today at (800) 361-2417 for a free consultation.
